Last week, I posted on my displeasure upon hearing of Paris Hilton being released from jail for unspecified "medical reasons."
In the interim, as you know, she was dragged screaming and crying from a courthouse back to jail after a judge ruled that the LA County Sheriff had no call to release her in the first place.
Oh, and how I laughed. I turned the schadenfreude up to 11. I really enjoyed seeing the clueless, elitist child of privilege go down in flames to be left smoldering in a jail cell.
I really wanted to post something about it at the time, but something began to bother me about the whole thing. Not so much the whole Paris-goes-to-jail part of it - she got what she deserved -, but how this society reacted to it. When you took a deep breath and looked at it, it was sort of how I imagine the behavior of the crowds at a Roman arena featuring the latest gladiatorial spectacle. So, I decided to leave it alone, pull back and move away from viewing this human train wreck.
And wouldn't you know it? Christopher Hitchens lays it out in no uncertain terms in Slate:
And now here I go, clearing my throat as above before deciding to do
something I would have never believed I would do, and choosing to write
about Paris Hilton. Choosing to write about her, furthermore, not just
as if she were some metaphor or signifier, but as a subject in herself.
At some point toward the middle of last Friday, it seemed to me, one
was being made a spectator to a small but important injustice. Those
gloating and jeering headlines, showing a tearful child being hauled
back to jail, had the effect of making me feel sick. So, you finally
got the kid to weep on camera? Are you happy now?
I don't mind
admitting that I, too, have watched Hilton undergoing the sexual act. I
phrase it as crudely as that because it was one of the least erotic
such sequences I have ever seen. She seemed to know what was expected
of her and to manifest some hard-won expertise, but I could almost have
believed that she was drugged. At no point did her facial expression
match even the simulacrum of lovemaking. (Kingsley Amis, a genius in
these matters and certainly no Puritan, once captured the combined
experience of the sordid and the illicit by saying that, even as he
wanted a certain spectacle to go on, he also wanted it to stop.)
(emphasis mine)
As he goes on, Hitch points out that, by our collective reaction, we emulate the puritanical fanatics that used to brand adulterers and burn witches:
Not content with seeing her undressed and variously penetrated, it
seems to be assumed that we need to watch her being punished and
humiliated as well. The supposedly "broad-minded" culture turns out to
be as prurient and salacious as the elders in The Scarlet Letter.
Hilton is legally an adult but the treatment she is receiving
stinks—indeed it reeks—of whatever horrible, buried, vicarious impulse
underlies kiddie porn and child abuse.
There are some parts of this essay that I take issue with. I find Sarah Silverman funny as hell. Her burning of Paris was simply true to type. After all, this is the woman who did Jesus Is Magic. It's interesting that at the end of her Paris bit, Silverman does look somewhat uncomfortable, and says, "Why do I feel dirty?" Well, I guess that's a question many of us should be asking.
Hitchens wraps this up by drawing an interesting parallel to Hilton's situation and the Scooter Libby ordeal. Overall, worth reading and remembering.
And revel in the irony, would you, of an avowed atheist showing the way to "Christian" charity.